From Amos to Cosby and Back Again:

The Portrayal of African-Americans on Television

 

           

                The portrayal of African-Americans on television is frequently a controversial topic. Throughout its rather brief history, television, in its programming, has skewed predominantly white. This was most clear in the 1950s and early 1960s, and it even remained true throughout the 1970s, when television shows with mainly all-African American casts became hits. The success of The Cosby Show in the 1980s helped to improve race relations somewhat, at least on television. Still, controversy continued, and still does to this day, as to which shows present negative stereotypes of African-Americans and which ones do not. Therefore, when one is talking about the history of African-Americans on television, it is best to begin with the show that is widely considered to be the epitome of negative stereotypes of African-Americans on television: The Amos and Andy Show.

            The Amos and Andy Show began life as a radio show in 1928. Two white dialecticians, Freeman Gosden and Charles Correll created it (McNeil, 1996, pg. 44). Set in Harlem, The Amos and Andy Show was the story of Amos Jones, who was voiced by Gosden, and Andrew H. Brown, who was voiced by Correll (Adventures in Cassettes, pg.1).  The Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) reportedly paid Gosden and Correll one million dollars each in exchange for the rights to the show (McNeil, pg. 44), and they planned to make it into a television show. However, Gosden and Correll were both white, and the cast of the television show had to be African-American. Therefore, a national search was conducted over the span of four years (Schutz, 1997, page 3). The show finally debuted on June 28, 1951 (McNeil, pg. 44). The television version, just like the radio version, proved to be a big success, and in fact rated 13th in the A.C. Nielsen television ratings for the 1951-1952 television season (McNeil, pg. 1144). However, as soon as the show debuted, it began drawing criticism from various organizations for its allegedly negative portrayal of African-Americans. An excellent example of this criticism came from a bulletin issued by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) on August 15, 1951, entitled “Why The Amos and Andy Show Should Be Taken Off the Air:”

1.It tends to strengthen the conclusion among uninformed and prejudiced people that Negroes are inferior, lazy, dumb and dishonest.

            2.Every character in this one and only TV show with an all Negro cast is either a

            clown or a crook.

            3.Negro doctors are shown as quacks and thieves.

            4.Negro lawyers are shown as slippery cowards, ignorant of their profession and

 without ethics.

 5.Negro Women are shown as cackling, screaming shrews, in big mouthed

 close-ups, using street slang, just short of vulgarity.

 6.All Negroes are shown as dodging work of any kind.

 7.Millions of white Americans see this Amos 'n' Andy picture of Negroes and              think the entire race is the same. 

(Lowe, 1998, pg. 3)

               

            Despite protests such as these, The Amos and Andy Show remained a hit until it ceased production in 1953. The show’s last original broadcast came on June 11, 1953. After ending its broadcast run, the reruns of the show were widely syndicated (McNeil, pg. 44). This all changed in 1963, when CBS Films, the company that was syndicating the show, announced that they had sold reruns of the show to Kenya and Western Nigeria. Soon following this announcement, the Kenyan government declared that the show would be banned in Kenya. After this announcement, attention was focused again on the alleged racism of the series. In 1963, when a station in Chicago, Ill., began showing repeats of the show, bitter protests began. Gradually, stations began dropping the show amid the protests, and CBS Films quietly withdrew the show from syndication in 1966 (Schultz, pg. 3). The debate over whether or not The Amos and Andy Show was racist continues to this day. Some people feel the show presented an incredibly negative view of African-Americans, while others, such as Charles Correll’s grandson, feel that “[The Amos and Andy Show] was not about racism, but about entertaining a nation that wanted and needed to laugh (Schutz, pg. 15).” Regardless of people’s opinions, one thing remains clear. As McNeil said, “Its historical significance should not be overlooked: It was the first show with an all-black cast, and the only one until Sanford and Son in 1972.” The Amos and Andy Show is, and always will be, a piece of television history.

            While there may not have been a television show with an all-African-American cast until 1971, in the 1960s, television shows did show signs of integrating. I Spy, a drama which ran on the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) from 1965 to 1968, co-starred Bill Cosby, making it the first non-comedic television show to star an African-American (McNeil, 404). Mission: Impossible, which ran on CBS from 1966 to 1973, featured African-American Greg Morris in a supporting role (McNeil, 556). This was one of several shows from the mid- to late-1960s that featured an African-American against a predominantly all-white cast. In 1968, the situation comedy (sitcom) Julia debuted on NBC. It was the first series since the 1950-1953 American Broadcasting Company (ABC) sitcom Beulah to star a black woman. Still, throughout the show’s three-season run, it featured a mainly white supporting cast, so it was not exactly a breakthrough show for African-Americans, as the cast was mostly white. However, a major turning point was just around the corner, in that magical decade of the 1970s.

            The aforementioned Sanford and Son debuted January 14, 1972 on NBC. As was stated earlier, it was the first show since The Amos and Andy Show to feature an all-African-American cast. The show was actually based on a popular British sitcom called Steptoe and Son. Television producers Norman Lear and Bud Yorkin “Americanized” the show by recasting the leads with African-Americans, and renamed it Sanford and Son. As was the case with a British sitcom Lear and Yorkin had previously “Americanized” (they took the British sitcom ‘Til Death Do Us Part, recast the leads, and made it into All in the Family), Sanford and Son became a big hit. During four of its six seasons, it garnered higher ratings than any other NBC prime-time series. In fact, during the 1972-1973 season and the 1974-1975 season it ranked number two in the Nielsen ratings, just behind the aforementioned All in the Family. The sitcom starred Redd Foxx (whose real name was John Sanford) as Fred Sanford and Demond Wilson as his son, Lamont Sanford. Fred worked as a junk dealer, and Lamont was devoted to helping his father, although he frequently wished he could be doing something else (McNeil 722).

 Though the show was a huge ratings success, its critical success is another question. Indeed, McNeil wondered whether the show presented “more objectionable stereotype[s]” than The Amos and Andy Show (pg. 45), which, as was mentioned before, was basically forced off the air by civil rights groups a mere six years before Sanford and Son debuted. Other people also criticized the show as depicting negative stereotypes of African-Americans. Nevertheless, the show was a great success, and stayed on the air until 1977, when Foxx and Wilson both left the show. NBC, desperate to hang on to a hit show, kept most of the supporting cast of Sanford and Son and simply renamed the series Sanford Arms. However, the attempt failed, and Sanford Arms turned out to be one of the first shows of the 1977-1978 season that were cancelled. Still, the success of the original Sanford and Son was clear. Several other successful sitcoms with mainly African-American casts made their debut in the mid- to late-1970s. Among these shows were CBS’ The Jeffersons (1975-1985) and Good Times (1974-1979), and ABC’s What’s Happening!! (1976-1979). Of course, while CBS and ABC were enjoying African-American sitcom success, NBC seemed to be left out in the cold, due to the defunct Sanford Arms. Fortunately for NBC, though, the 1980s would bring them the most successful African-American sitcom of all time: The Cosby Show.

The Cosby Show debuted September 20, 1984. It revolved around the Huxtables, an African-American family that lived in a townhouse in Brooklyn. Bill Cosby led the cast as Cliff Huxtable, an obstetrician. Cosby, as was stated earlier, also was the first African-American to star in a drama, which he did in I Spy. Cliff’s wife, a lawyer named Clair, was played by Phylicia Ayers-Allen, who was later known as Phylicia Rashad, after she married sportscaster Ahmad Rashad (McNeil, pg. 181). It was in this that first marked the first significance of The Cosby Show. The Huxtables were a very successful, two-income household. On previous television sitcoms, African-Americans had rarely been seen as overly successful.

The family portrayed in The Cosby Show was a very functional, nuclear family. The Huxtable’s five children were successful in their own right. In many ways, the child characters on the show were just extensions of the child characters on past sitcoms. The difference is that on those sitcoms, the children were white, while on The Cosby Show, they were African-American. In fact, The Cosby Show resembled sitcoms of television’s past. It revolved around the traditional nuclear family with traditional values, and the stories on the show always taught a moral lesson. However, unlike shows of the past, The Cosby Show was centered exclusively on black people, and that was key to the show’s success. The Cosby Show was so gentle, and the family life it depicted was so functional, that if it were centered on a white family, it probably would have failed, because there would not have been anything to make it stand out from the crowd. The Cosby Show likely would not have been a hit.

As it was, though, The Cosby Show was a hit. The fact that it was a hit show was, initially, somewhat surprising. Since I Spy, Bill Cosby had tried three television shows, and none were successes: 1969-1971’s The Bill Cosby Show, 1972-1973’s The New Bill Cosby Show, and 1976’s Cos. The Cosby Show also had another card stacked against it. By 1984, several television analysts had predicted the demise of the television sitcom (McNeil, 180). Indeed, in the previous season (1983-1984), only two sitcoms broke into the Nielsen Top Twenty highest-rated television shows (McNeil, 1157). Previous sitcom hits, such as Three’s Company, were on their last legs, and new sitcoms such as Family Ties and Cheers were just barely staying alive. Against all these odds, though, The Cosby Show emerged victorious, and came in third place in the Nielsen ratings its first season. It then came in first in the ratings each season thereafter until the 1989-1990 season, when it again placed second. The Cosby Show helped increase Family Ties’ and Cheers’ audiences, and helped NBC build a powerhouse Thursday night prime-time lineup, something that the network enjoys to this day.

While The Cosby Show was a great critical and ratings success, it was also chided by some African-American groups. Ironically, it was the very fact that the Huxtables were black that earned The Cosby Show its criticism. It was criticized for not being “black” enough. These African-American groups also said that few African-American families are as financially successful as the Huxtables. None of this criticism, though, undermines the significance of The Cosby Show. Through its ratings success (which continued until the show ceased production in 1992), The Cosby Show brought white people and African-American people together, at least in front of the television.

Actually, The Cosby Show turned out to be one of the last television shows white people and African-American people did watch together. Throughout the 1990s, studies were taken, and these studies showed that there is not a single non-sports television show in the Nielsen Top Ten in African-American households that is also in the Nielsen Top Ten in white households. Todd Boyd, a professor of critical studies at the University of

Southern California, believes that this fact is evident of more than just our television viewing habits: “The representations we see in popular culture are another way to point out how segregated we are as far as race (Goodale, 1998, pg. 13).”

            The audience is not the only thing that have changed since The Cosby Show years. The actual programming has as well. In 1995, both the Warner Brothers Television Network (WB) and the United Paramount Network (UPN) were launched, and both networks, eager to find audiences, decided to develop shows that would appeal to the audience they felt was most neglected in television: the African-American audience. So far, the idea has paid off, as both WB and UPN have found audiences. However, these shows have often been criticized by critics and African-American groups for a severe lack of the kind of intelligence that The Cosby Show possessed, and actually may foster segregation. Such shows as WB’s The Wayans Bros. and UPN’s Malcolm and Eddie (which, ironically, co-stars former Cosby Show star Malcolm Jamal-Warner) have been categorized by Harvard psychiatrist Alvin Poussaint as a “ghettoization of television viewing (Goodale, pg. 13).”

            Retired General Colin Powell has also spoken out against the dysfunctional families and the dysfunctional human beings seen on these recent African-American sitcoms, believing that they can affect children in an adverse manner. “If [dysfunctional television characters are] what it’s all about, then we might as well go back to Amos ‘n’ Andy,” Powell has said (Jet, 1998, pg. 46). Television critic Robert Bianco of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, when reviewing Malcolm and Eddie, as well as three now-defunct African American sitcoms, Goode Behavior, Sparks, and Homeboys in Outer Space, in 1996, wrote: “In 1966, after years of protests, black audiences finally forced Amos and Andy off the air. Thirty years later, Amos, Andy and their various cultural cousins are back--with new names and a new network home, the fledgling UPN. …. [The shows seem] to encourage aberrant and antisocial behavior (Schutz, page 12).”

            The last two quotations both compare the new African-American sitcoms to The Amos and Andy Show, a sitcom that is considered so racist it has been basically banned from television for the past thirty years. As we enter into the 21st century, portrayal of African-Americans on television appears to have come full circle. If African-American groups, and television executives, are not careful, everything old may be new again.

 

WORKS CITED

            Anonymous. “Colin Powell Urges Hollywood to Show Youth Better Images of Blacks on TV.” Jet. Chicago: Nov. 16, 1998.

 

            Goodale, Gloria. “TV in Black and White. No Current TV Show Ranks in the Top 10 With Both Black and White Viewers.” The Christian Science Monitor. Boston: Nov. 20, 1998.

 

            Lowe, Jim. “Tim Moore.” http://www.geocities.com/~jimlowe/tmoore/tmoordex.html January 27, 1998.

 

            McNeil, Alex. Total Television: The Comprehensive Guide to Programming From 1948 to the Present, fourth edition. New York: Penguin Books, 1996.

 

Shutz, David. “The Original Amos ‘n’ Andy Web Page.” http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2587/index.html  December 13, 1998